Binding enum arrays with MVC models

The simplicity of model binding in the MVC framework makes it a powerful and pleasant framework to send models up and down to views. But a little short coming prevents the usage of enum arrays and raising maintainability in my opinion. MVC 4 cannot convert / materialize enum values to an array when used in a model. To put it correctly, there is no standard type converter for the job.

This issue manifested when I was working on a checkbox list of statuses that could be selected as a filter. This would then be posted as a comma separated parameter value to be set on the model object. Which is finally used in a LINQ query.

Convert all the (C#) types!

Well, almost all. So here is an incredible handy conversion class that I always carry around in all my projects. It has never failed me, never let me down... you get the idea. Although I cannot take full credit for it, thank Steven for the initial setup, I have done some minor tweaks in the past.

Usage is pretty straight forward. Call the (generic) method, put in a string in the correct format, converted and casted type comes out.

var value = Conversion.AsValue<int>("123"); 
//// Returns 123 as int

var value = Conversion.AsValue<int?>("123"); 
//// Returns 123 as nullable int

var value = Conversion.AsValue<int?>(""); 
//// Returns null (handy for webrequest parameters)

Improved compiletime supported validators

After a the initial post on the compile-time supporting webform validators, a few itches started to surface. Mainly the extendability and cleanliness. With some slight changes it was possible to categorize the validators (thus enforcing more of the Single Responsibility Principle).

Usage

The following code demonstrates the usage of this API. Note that there are breaking changes if you are replacing the previous version.

protected override void OnInit(EventArgs e)
{
    base.OnInit(e);

    this.UsernameField.Validation().RequiredField("username");
    this.PasswordField.Validation().RequiredField("password");
}

Read the original post for implementation details.